Allen; for the Center for Constitutional Rights et al.The States are not free, under the guise of protecting maternal health or potential life, to intimidate women into continuing pregnancies.Kathryn Kolbert argued the cause for appellees.
Schwartz, Carol Boyk, Judith Gordon, and Lorraine Loder; for the Unitarian Universalist Association et al.The reporting requirements of those sections raise the specter of public exposure and harassment of women who choose to exercise their personal, intensely private, right, with their physician, to end a pregnancy.With a full record before it on the issues as to the validity of the Act and with the intervening decisions in Akron, Ashcroft, and Simopoulos at hand, the Court of Appeals was justified in proceeding to plenary review of those issues.Court, in which Brennan, Marshall, Powell, and Stevens, JJ.Association of Los Angeles, California, et al.
Thompson; and for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.Warshaw, Chief Deputy Attorney General.Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.Miller; for the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, Inc.It was not limited to determining whether the District Court abused its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction.Wikisource, the free online libraryAppellees brought an action in Federal District Court alleging that the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 violated the Federal Constitution and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.Rogers; for the National Right to Life Committee, Inc.
See Also: Love Dating Bd
Crothers; for the National Organization for Women et al.The provisions of the Pennsylvania Act that the Court of Appeals invalidated wholly subordinate constitutional privacy interests and concerns with maternal health to the effort to deter a woman from making a decision that, with her physician, is hers to make.Arthur Kinoy; and for Olivia Gans et al.Lynn; for the American Medical Association et al.Gordon, Senior Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, argued the cause for appellants.Madeline Kochen; for Senator Bob Packwood et al.Applegate; for the National Abortion Rights Action League et al.
See Also: Love Compatibility On Date Of Birth
But the jurisdictional statement here is treated as a petition for certiorari, and the writ is granted.The court held that the validity of other provisions of the Act might depend on evidence adduced at the trial and accordingly remanded these features of the case to the District Court.Thus, they pose an unacceptable danger of deterring the exercise of that right and must be invalidated.Sullivan; for Susan Bandes et al.Olson, Assistant Attorneys General; for the American Civil Liberties Union et al.
Act which it held was invalid.State that it is advancing any legitimate interest.